M.’s trespasses were so much more egregious. Was Tracy the problem-or was it the sleazeballs around her? As part of the film’s sweeping reassessment, an essay in the Times noted how strange, yet how predictable, it was that Tracy endured as an unsavory figure, given that Mr. Rewatching “Election,” many Americans saw, as if for the first time, a dogged go-getter being mocked and dismissed. says.) Then came the #MeToo movement, and an actual election, in 2016, that pitted an eminently qualified woman against a telegenic, woefully unfit magnate. (“I wanted to slow her down before she flattened the whole school,” Mr. She became a symbol for a new class of strivers, women willing to plow or charm their way to the top. The film version of “Election” was a cult hit, and many viewers deemed Tracy-with her blond bob, chipper sex appeal, and cartoonish need to win-the villain. also fantasized about sleeping with Tracy, and he blamed her for that, too. He’d held a vendetta against Tracy ever since his best friend, a fellow-teacher, slept with her and lost his job. M., subverted the democratic process in order to advance his candidate, a jock from a well-off family. ![]() But she also did the reading, believed in the system, and played by the rules. ![]() In the film adaptation, which featured a career-defining performance by Reese Witherspoon, she lacked an off switch and a sense of proportion. Yes, she was ambitious, assertive, a little crazed in her quest to become student-body president. The teen-age star of “Election,” a 1998 novel by Tom Perrotta, deserved better. The verdict is in on Tracy Flick: we did her wrong.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |